Better handling tools explored for non-ambulatory swine

Moving non-ambulatory pigs with drag mat reduces risk and stress to pigs and workers; new research suggests best type of handling tools.

January 30, 2020

4 Min Read
iStock/Getty Images

What do producers do when livestock are not able to walk due to illness or injury? This problem does not have an easy solution, although that may change soon, according to researchers at Iowa State University.

National standards for humane management of swine require sick or injured non-ambulatory pigs to be moved with a drag mat, in most situations, Iowa State said in an announcement. This reduces risk and stress to pigs and is also meant to make moving an animal safer and less stressful for swine producers.

Still, the industry has yet to find an effective and practical drag mat. The National Pork Board guidance on humane swine handling through the Pork Quality Assurance Plus certification and educational programs sets criteria swine caretakers and producers must use if they want certification through the Common Swine Industry Audit (CSIA), Iowa State explained. The 2014 rules prohibit “dragging of conscious animals by any part of their body, except in the rare case where a non-ambulatory animal must be moved for a life-threatening situation,” and indicate that non-ambulatory pigs may be moved by using a drag mat.

“These guidelines sound straightforward, but producers have been telling us that to meet the requirements, they need better tools that are economically feasible, pig safe and worker safe,” said Anna Johnson, professor of farm animal behavior and welfare in the Iowa State department of animal science.

As a result, Johnson worked with animal science graduate student Ella Akin to research the problem. Akin, now a health and animal care associate for a pig production company in Nebraska, led the study for her master’s thesis, in cooperation with other team members. Their findings are described in two new Iowa State Animal Industry Reports that review the experience of workers in a pork production facility using four different types of handling tools.

In preliminary work, Akin observed caretakers using rubber weaning mats. “We found that these rubber mats really are not satisfactory drag mats for finisher pigs,” she said. “The mats were too heavy, tore easily and pigs kept sliding off. They also were difficult for caretakers to handle.”

This led Akin and the team to consider better options. They adapted other types of handling tools for on-farm use, developing three modifications to test: a sked (from an HMH sked rescue system), a sled and a deer sled modified from the type hunters use. Five swine facility employees — one woman and four men — assessed the handling tools on a commercial swine facility site in central Iowa.

In two controlled experiments, they moved three sizes of market-weight pigs (cadavers weighing about 130, 201 and 216 lb.). Employees used each handling tool to move all sizes of pig over a distance representing a typical length from a home pen to a hospital pen. The employees also had to roll, position and reposition the pigs. The handling tools’ effectiveness were rated based on employee heart rate, force, handling tool duration and durability. Researchers also assessed the tools based on cost and on the employees’ satisfaction with using the handling tools.

Iowa State swinehandlingtoolsimagesakin-1.jpg

Iowa State swinehandlingtoolsimagesakin-2.jpg

In the end, they considered the sked as the easiest tool to use overall, in part because of convenient, buckle-type restraints that helped keep the cadavers in place, according to the announcement. The sled was ranked as more difficult or neutral due to the longer time it took to secure string-type restraints. The modified deer sled was considered very easy to use due to its size and weight but was not preferred without restraint straps.

“It is important to look at handling tools that are CSIA compliant,” Johnson said. “The stakes are pretty high. We need better solutions. This is a good start and gives us an idea of what isn’t working and what might work better, but these options still need more testing in different situations.”

Details of the research were published in two Animal Industry Reports: "Employee Survey to Determine Movement Ease for Grow-Finish Pig Cadavers On-Farm Using a Sked, Deer Sled & Modified Deer Sled" and "Movement Ease for Grow-Finish Pig Cadavers On-Farm Using a Sked, Deer Sled & Modified Dear Sled." Other authors include animal science professors Jason W. Ross and Kenneth J. Stalder, professor of veterinary medicine Suzanne T. Millman and Dr. Cassandra Jass and John Stinn with Iowa Select Farms.

The research was supported by the Iowa Pork Producers Assn., the Iowa State University College of Agriculture & Life Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, with in-kind assistance from Iowa Select Farms.

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Feedstuffs is the news source for animal agriculture

You May Also Like