Feedstuffs is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Kansas State researchers study wheat for grazing, grain

TAGS: Beef
File photo by Kansas State University Kansas State grazing wheat.jpg
Researchers at Kansas State University have studied the performance of 28 wheat varieties in a dual-purpose system.
Performance of 28 wheat varieties evaluated when managed for winter and spring grazing, followed by summer harvest for grain.

Kansas State University researchers have released findings of a study to identify the best-performing varieties when producers are growing wheat for grain and grazing, known as a dual-purpose system.

Kansas State Research & Extension wheat specialist Romulo Lollato said he and his colleagues tested 28 wheat varieties at the South Central Experiment Field near Hutchinson, Kan. — simulating grazing the crop in the winter and early spring and harvesting grain in the summer — to determine how the performance of different wheat varieties compared when managed under the dual-purpose system versus a grain-only system, the university said in an announcement.

“The three most important things that we need to keep in mind when selecting a wheat variety for a dual-purpose system are fall forage production, the date of the first hollow stem and how varieties respond to grazing stress,” Lollato said.

The yield potential of fall forage is important because it affects the potential beef production from cattle grazing wheat in the fall, winter and spring. Lollato said approximately 100 lb. of beef can be produced for every 1,000 lb. of dry matter from wheat forage production in an acre.

The date of the first hollow stem will determine when producers should stop grazing cattle. Grazing past the first hollow stem can decrease the following spring’s wheat yield by as much as 1-5% per day, Lollato said.

How well wheat varieties respond to stress often shows up in the grain yield following grazing compared to the ungrazed counterparts.

“The recovery of wheat varieties from grazing is very specific to the variety,” Lollato said.

He said one trend researchers found in their study is that wheat yields in a grain-only system might not necessarily indicate how a variety would stack up in a dual-purpose system.

“What we saw this year is typically what we see year in and year out,” Lollato said. “Sometimes, in the dual-purpose situation, we have different varieties showing up toward the top (of the wheat yield rankings). The potential to bounce back from grazing is showing up whenever we look at the ranking of those varieties in the dual-purpose situation.”

For example, Lollato said a few varieties were among the top-yielding group in both grazed and ungrazed scenarios, including Rock Star (a Polansky variety) and two Westbred varieties: WB4269 and WB4699.

“When evaluating the grazed-plus-grain group only, other varieties, including a few from Oklahoma State University, also appeared in the top-yielding group, showing that those varieties might be better suited for the dual-purpose system,” he said.

The researchers tested several varieties grown in Kansas and the surrounding region, including varieties from Oklahoma.

Hide comments
account-default-image

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish