Sponsored By

Mapping tool tracks elk migration to reduce brucellosis riskMapping tool tracks elk migration to reduce brucellosis risk

New computer model of elk behavior during spring migration identifies habitats with highest risk of transmitting brucellosis from elk to cattle.

October 23, 2017

4 Min Read
Mapping tool tracks elk migration to reduce brucellosis risk
Elk and cattle commingle on a hay line in western Wyoming. Scientists have created a new mapping tool to reduce the risk of transmitting brucellosis from elk to cattle.Mark Gocke

Wildlife managers and ranchers in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem soon will have a new mapping tool for reducing the risk of brucellosis outbreaks in cattle. That's thanks to research led by scientists at the University of Wyoming and the U.S. Geological Survey.

The team of biologists built a computer model of elk behavior during spring migration to identify habitats with the highest risk of brucellosis spilling over from elk to cattle.

Brucellosis is a bacterial disease carried by elk and bison that can cause pregnant females to abort their fetuses. It is transmitted by direct contact with the infected placenta, fetus or birthing fluid.

Cattle can be infected by commingling with elk between February and June. Transmission peaks from March to May -- the same months when most elk migrate to calving grounds and mountain summer ranges.

The scientists' migration model tracks spring snowmelt and forage green-up to predict where elk will be when they abort. That information is crucial for managers charged with preventing disease transmission.

If a cattle herd contracts the disease, it can lead to herd quarantines, increased testing and potential culling of the index herd and any contact herds sharing a fence line. These movement restrictions can be very costly for cattle producers.

"Keeping elk and cattle separate during that crucial migration period ensures cattle don't come into contact with brucellosis," said Jerod Merkle, a postdoctoral researcher with the Wyoming Migration Initiative at the University of Wyoming.

Merkle was lead author on a paper published recently in the Journal of Applied Ecology.

Using global positioning collar data from nearly 300 elk captured on supplemental feeding grounds in Wyoming, the team of researchers built models of elk movement that decipher how elk respond to snow depth, plant green-up and other landscape features such as slope and aspect.

The researchers then simulated elk distribution at daily intervals across five weather scenarios that varied the amount of winter snow and the timing of spring green-up.

Given an average population of about 15,000 adult and yearling female elk in the southern greater Yellowstone ecosystem during the study period, the team's model predicts that, on average, about 700 abortions occur per year.

As expected, the modeled distribution of where these abortions occur varies drastically depending on when snowmelt and green-up happen. In an average snow year, about 33% of the abortions occur within 1.5 miles of feeding grounds, 43% occur in national forests, 12% occur on private land, 7% occur in national parks or national wildlife refuges and the rest occur across Bureau of Land Management, state and local government lands.

During heavy snow years, the model showed the highest brucellosis transmission risk at lower elevations on or near feeding grounds, because elk are likely to abort before they migrate into the mountains.

In years of winter drought with little snowfall, the modeled rate of abortions on feeding grounds declined 64% versus heavy snow years. That's because elk migrated earlier in the calving season and were more likely to abort on higher-elevation transitional and summer ranges on other public lands (mainly national forests).

Notably, the research team predicted little difference in the number of abortions that occur on private lands across the weather scenarios. While cattle in Wyoming are essentially free of brucellosis today thanks to testing and antibiotics, bovines were the original hosts for the bacteria that infected the elk populations. Efforts to inoculate free-ranging elk against the disease have been largely unsuccessful, leading managers to turn to management measures to reduce the risk of disease transmission.

Recent mitigation work by the Wyoming Game & Fish Department has focused on changing practices at state-operated elk feeding grounds. By spreading out hay over larger areas of the feeding grounds and shortening the period of feeding, wildlife managers can reduce the chances of an elk aborting its fetus in a crowded situation where other elk would be exposed. That, in turn, may help lower the prevalence of the disease in elk and the risk of transmission to cattle.

Importantly, the new modeling tool helps managers prioritize mitigation responses in areas outside of feeding grounds by responding to when and where elk migrate during calving season.

"Wildlife and livestock managers can utilize this model to focus prevention efforts in high-risk areas and minimize disease transmission," said Brandon Scurlock, leader of the Wyoming Game & Fish Department's brucellosis program.

Strategies to reduce elk and cattle contact include hazing elk away from cattle feeding areas or postponing cattle turnout dates until the risk of brucellosis transmission has subsided.

This research was conducted in collaboration with the Wyoming Game & Fish Department and was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food & Agriculture, the National Science Foundation, the Greater Yellowstone Interagency Brucellosis Committee and Grand Teton National Park.

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Feedstuffs is the news source for animal agriculture

You May Also Like