Harvest ramps up mycotoxin testing awareness

Mycotoxins can come from the field or can be produced in storage, but either way, mitigating mycotoxins requires a strategy.

September 21, 2020

3 Min Read
Harvest ramps up mycotoxin testing awareness

As farmers start the fall harvest after the 2020 growing season, toxins may not be on the radar, but these antinutritional factors can still be lurking within feedstuffs on farms across the U.S., according to Rock River Laboratory in Wisconsin.

“Wheat harvest, corn silage and corn grain harvests are typically the times we see the most mycotoxin analysis requests at the lab,” John Goeser, Rock River Laboratory animal nutrition, research and innovation director, said.

By broad definition, a toxin is a poison produced by an organism that can harm another organism. Toxins can be produced by frogs, snakes, etc. Inversely, “mycotoxins are a specific type of toxin, which can be produced by fungi and are fungal secondary metabolites,” Goeser explained. When produced by fungi, they can prove toxic to humans and animals at parts per billion levels.

“Typically, mycotoxins are released by fungi in response to some stressor,” he said. “The conditions that lead to fungal stress aren’t exactly understood — it could be moisture stress, auxiliary stress or other instigators.” Adding to the ambiguity of mycotoxin causing factors, these facets are independent of each other. Goeser noted that the presence of mold and fungi doesn’t necessarily indicate that mycotoxins are present in a feed, just like a positive mycotoxin test doesn’t indicate culturable living mold or spores exist within the feed. “A mold could be dead and gone, but just leave a mycotoxin behind.”

Goeser explained that mycotoxins can come from the field or they can be produced in storage. “Different classes are produced in different areas,” Goeser said. “Common mycotoxins we test for are typically more field produced. However, professor Damon Smith from the University of Wisconsin plant pathology department has commented to me that some common mycotoxins may also increase during storage in silos. There is much yet to learn in this area.”

Chemists have recognized 18,000 mycotoxins, though the ability to detect and quantify these mycotoxins is only a fraction of the total. “We typically look at five major mycotoxins in feed analysis when troubleshooting nutritional challenges,” Goeser explained, which include:

1. Vomitoxin (deoxynivalenol (DON)): An immunosuppressant, DON can interfere with rumen metabolism and harm bodily tissues like the gut lining. “We’ve used DON as a marker to determine if there are mycotoxins present in some cases,” explains Goeser.

2. Zearalenone: Mimics estrogen and can interact with the reproductive system in the organisms who ingest it.

3. Fumonisins: These mycotoxins are known to affect the liver and kidneys.

4. Aflatoxin: Produced by aspergillus, a hot climate mold, these mycotoxins are carcinogenic and regulated.

5. T2: Similar effects as DON, however, this mycotoxin is much more potent and exerts its negative effects at parts per billion levels.

According to Goeser, there are always multiple mycotoxins present, and they can act additively. Because of this, he recommended that “for severe clinical cases or diagnostic situations, we should use a mycotoxin panel approach to seek a comprehensive assessment of these compounds that will affect animals.”

Regardless of the reason, mitigating mycotoxins requires a strategy. “Mycotoxins are fairly stable in silage,” Goeser said. “Test close to the time of being fed and pay attention to news from the industry and our team to understand what seasonal and regional trends may be influencing their presence.” He also recommended working with a trusted crop adviser, nutritionist and veterinarian to assess the challenge and form a strategy.

In cases of harmful mycotoxin loads, Goeser said there are two approaches. “Dilute them with a clean crop, or feed an additive or binder that will glob on and pass them through the animal.”

Ultimately, mycotoxins are just one class of feed hygiene challenges or contaminants. “Mycotoxins should be interpreted along with other contaminant measures in many cases. Give consideration to fungal and wild yeast contamination, undesirable bacterial growth, and consider other stressors due to nutrition, management or the environment,” Goeser said. “In such situations, a (total mixed ration) hygiene diagnostic approach could be the shotgun approach needed to develop a proactive plan forward.”

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Feedstuffs is the news source for animal agriculture

You May Also Like