Report identifies states most dependent on NAFTAReport identifies states most dependent on NAFTA
Farmers for Free Trade releases report identifying top 10 states that would experience massive tax on products from U.S. farmers with no NAFTA.
January 24, 2018
Farmers for Free Trade, a bipartisan, grassroots campaign working to rebuild support for trade, released a new report that outlines specific threats facing the states most dependent on agricultural trade with Mexico under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) if America withdraws from the pact. The report, "The NAFTA Withdrawal Tax," looks at the percentage tariff increase the major commodities from each state would face in Mexico.
“Just as farmers and ranchers have been among the biggest beneficiaries of NAFTA, they’d also be the ones to feel the most pain if America withdraws from the pact,” Sens. Max Baucus (D., Mont.) and Richard Lugar (R., Ind.) - the Farmers for Free Trade co-chairs - said following the release of the report. "That’s because NAFTA withdrawal would result in a massive tax on the products American farmers grow and produce."
In the report, Farmers for Free Trade identifies the 10 states whose agricultural sectors would be the most negatively affected by NAFTA withdrawal with respect to trade with Mexico and outlines the steep price they would pay in the event of withdrawal.
“These taxes would lead to fewer products sold and declining profits. They would result in our farmers selling less to Mexico and declining prices, which is the last thing farmers can afford, particularly right when prices are already low and global supplies are high,” Baucus and Lugar said.
The states profiled in this new report are: (1) Missouri, (2) New Mexico, (3) South Dakota, (4) Texas, (5) Nebraska, (6) Iowa, (7) Kansas, (8) Arkansas, (9) North Dakota and (10) Minnesota.
Missouri, ranking number one on the impact list, exported 51% of its total agricultural exports to Mexico. In 2016, it exported $35.76 million in dairy exports. If the U.S. withdraws from NAFTA, Missouri would see a 45% tax on cheese. Meat and meat packaging products similarly represented a $39.61 million export market in 2016. Withdrawal of NAFTA would institute a 25% tax for beef and up to 20% for pork.
Missouri’s oilseeds and grain products represent the largest segment of exports, reaching $438.63 million for oilseeds and grains and $3232.62 million for grain and oilseed milling products in 2016. Soy flour, for example, would face a 20% tax without NAFTA.
New Mexico ranks number two concerning the impact it would feel after a NAFTA withdrawal. It exports 45% of its total agricultural products to Mexico, with dairy representing half of all of its exports, valued at $45.73 million.
For the entire country, $170 million in dairy exports went to Mexico in 2016. If Mexico places a 45% tariff on dairy products, it could create an additional $76.5 million in duties yearly without NAFTA in place.
As for pork, $1.3 billion of exports went to Mexico in 2016. If the U.S. withdraws from NAFTA, Mexico’s 10% tariff on pork would result in an additional $130 million in duties per year on all pork sales.
Chicken tariffs would be astronomical, reaching a tariff of up to 75%. For the $871 million in exports to Mexico, the additional yearly duties would come to $653 million.
South Dakota sends 39% of its total agricultural exports to Mexico. In 2016, South Dakota exported $134.87 million of meat and meat packaging products and $71.65 million in beverages, with beer seeing a 20% tax without NAFTA.
Texas also ranks high on the list, with $1.58 billion of meat and meat packaging products going to Mexico in 2016. Dairy represents 11% of the Texas agricultural economy, and $361.93 million in dairy exports went to Mexico in 2016.
Baucus and Lugar explained that the tariffs, or tax hikes, in these states would also be felt in rural communities.
“It’s not only farmers who would pay the price for NAFTA withdrawal; rural communities, which run on the engine of the farm economy, would suffer, too. If farmers have less in their pockets, they spend less at local stores (and) restaurants and contribute less to local schools and community organizations," Baucus and Lugar stated. "Jobs throughout the agricultural production cycle that depend on trade suffer, including growers, harvesters, processors, packagers as well as grain elevator operators, railroad workers and truck drivers. The simple truth is that rural communities don't work well when their economic engine is hurting."
View the full impact report here.
About the Author(s)
You May Also Like
Iowa turkey flocks confirmed with HPAIOct 23, 2023
Current Conditions for
New York, NY
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
This Week in Agribusiness, Dec. 9, 2023Dec 09, 2023
Grains face modest end-of-week cutsAug 01, 2023
CN acquiring Iowa Northern RailwayDec 08, 2023
HPAI cases rising in California as virus spreads nationwideDec 08, 2023