N&H TOPLINE: For a better flu vaccine, focus on neglected 'N'

Placing greater emphasis on neuraminidase in influenza vaccines could substantially decrease flu infection rates and reduce disease severity for those already infected.

Tim Lundeen 1, Feedstuffs Editor

April 6, 2018

3 Min Read
N&H TOPLINE: For a better flu vaccine, focus on neglected 'N'
A schematic of the influenza virus surface where the blue tetramers are the neuraminidase glycoprotein and the brown trimers are the hemagglutinin glycoprotein.Credit: The Wilson Laboratory.

Vaccine technology and the use of vaccines in veterinary medicine have expanded in recent years. A common question in vaccine development is which portion of a virus to target in the vaccine.

This question is also important on the human health side, especially in the development of influenza vaccines. Vaccines designed to protect people from the influenza virus tend to concentrate on hemagglutinin (the "H"), one of the two prominently displayed proteins on the surface of the virus and the primary target for influenza prevention.

In the April 5 issue of the journal Cell, however, teams led by Patrick Wilson at the University of Chicago Medicine and Florian Krammer at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai Hospital in New York City argue that placing greater emphasis on the comparatively neglected protein neuraminidase (the "N") could substantially decrease infection rates and reduce disease severity for those infected with the virus.

These two viral-surface glycoproteins have distinct roles. Hemagglutinin enables the virus to attach to a host’s cell membranes and enter that cell. Once inside the cell, the virus makes multiple copies of itself, and the copies then prepare to burst out of their hijacked cell to infect more cells.

The virus cannot get out of the cell without help from the other protein, however. Neuraminidase facilitates egress; it enables newly formed viral particles to escape the original cell and infect nearby cells, where they multiply again, repeating the process and allowing the infection to spread rapidly throughout the body.

“Hemagglutinin activity has been the primary measure of influenza vaccine efficacy for decades,” said Wilson, the study’s senior author and a professor of medicine at the University of Chicago.

The current anti-flu vaccines concentrate on hemagglutinin, “but they do a poor job of stimulating the immune system to neutralize neuraminidase,” Wilson said. “Neuraminidase -- one of two prime targets -- has been profoundly neglected. This leaves a big hole in immunity.”

Interim estimates from the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention confirm the need for a more trustworthy vaccine. The "U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness" survey found that the vaccine’s ability to protect people from influenza A or B during the period from Nov. 2, 2017, to Feb. 3, 2018, was a dismal 36%. That fell to 25% for the H3N2 influenza A virus. In the previous three influenza seasons, vaccine effectiveness has ranged from a low of 19% to a high of 48%.

So, Wilson and his colleagues focused instead on the neglected link. Neuraminidase is “highly immunogenic,” he said. Infection induces nearly equal numbers of neuraminidase and hemagglutinin-reactive B cells, which produce the crucial antibodies that block activity of flu-related viral proteins.

The current vaccines rarely trigger an effective response from neuraminidase-reactive B cells. “The hemagglutinin tends to maintain its structure, but the neuraminidase -- a more complicated, delicate, four-part structure -- breaks down; it sort of falls apart,” Wilson said.

As a result, the antibodies that should neutralize neuraminidase, thereby locking potentially virulent viral particles inside infected cells, are much less effective. In many cases, the authors noted, the neuraminidase component of the vaccines triggers antibody production at levels “nearly 90-fold lower” than antibodies aimed at hemagglutinin.

“The current vaccines rely on sub-units -- small pieces of the neuraminidase protein -- rather than the full target,” Wilson said. “The current process of inactivating the vaccine seems to destroy the neuraminidase protein.”

When the researchers tested monoclonal antibodies collected from un-vaccinated mice that were infected with influenza, they found that those antibodies could provide robust protection. Even when given to mice 48 hours after infection with the virus, the neuraminidase-reactive antibodies were effective at levels comparable to the hemagglutinin-reactive antibodies, protecting the mice from a lethal influenza challenge.

“Our results demonstrate that hemagglutinin should no longer be the de facto target in influenza vaccine development efforts,” Wilson said. “We think including an improved neuraminidase component to future influenza vaccine compositions can reduce the severity of illness and decrease the frequency of community-acquired influenza infections.”

“With a robust response to neuraminidase, the degree of protection conferred might protect from any influenza infection,” the authors concluded, suggesting that it could even provide “broad-ranging protection against potential pandemic strains that express N1 or N2 neuraminidases.”

About the Author(s)

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Feedstuffs is the news source for animal agriculture

You May Also Like