Group sues USDA over GE labelingGroup sues USDA over GE labeling
Lawsuit challenges that USDA did not complete study on electronic and digital disclosures like QR codes by July 2017 date.
August 29, 2017
On Monday, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) filed a federal lawsuit against the Administration for its failure to comply with the 2016 federal law on the labeling of genetically engineered (GE) food.
Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue and the U.S. Department of Agriculture are tasked with implementing the new labeling rules, and part of that process is a study on “electronic and digital disclosures,” such as quick response (QR) codes for GE foods, as opposed to on-package text. That study was required to be finished by July 2017, with an opportunity for public participation, but USDA never completed the study or published it for public comment.
“Because this is a controversial topic and crucial decision, Congress required this QR code study be completed by July and that the public’s views be included. In court, statutory directives matter — not tweets. We won’t let the Trump Administration get away with ignoring the law,” said George Kimbrell, legal director for CFS.
The federal GE food law requires USDA to establish federal standards for labeling by July 2018. The withheld study will inform the agency’s ultimate decision, which is why it was required to be completed a year earlier, CFS said.
One of the most controversial aspects of the law is how it will require companies to label GE foods and whether companies will be able to forgo clear, on-package labeling through the use of QR codes and other digital disclosures. The new federal law allows USDA to consider several options: on-package text, a GE symbol on packages or “electronic or digital disclosures,” which would require shoppers to use a smartphone to scan packages and access a website or call a 1-800 number for every single product to find out if it was produced with genetic engineering.
“The study is crucial because it will analyze if this type of digital labeling will make the information accessible or not, based on several factors. If USDA concludes, based on the study, that these disclosures will not provide consumers sufficient access, then USDA must require consumers be given alternative options,” CFS said in a statement.
“Americans deserve nothing less than clear on-package labeling, the way food has always been labeled,” Kimbrell said. “Allowing companies to hide genetically engineered ingredients behind a website or QR code is discriminatory and unworkable.”
In the U.S., there has never been a food labeling requirement met by “QR” codes instead of on-package labeling. CFS said electronic labeling will not provide disclosure to a large portion of Americans, disproportionately affecting minority, low-income and elderly people. This is because:
Studies show that half of low-income people do not own smartphones.
Almost half of rural people do not own smartphones.
Minorities make up a disproportionate percentage of low-income and rural Americans.
Two-thirds of the elderly do not own smartphones.
Overall, only 64% of Americans own a smartphone.
Few people have ever used a QR code, as only 16% have ever scanned a QR code, and only 3% of those people do it regularly.
Shoppers would have to scan all of the many items they are shopping for on any given shopping trip (which, for a family of four, could easily amount to more than 50 items). “This would be an undue burden on the consumer and greatly impede access to information that is currently required for all other forms of food labeling. On-package labeling is simple, quick and effective; QR codes, websites and 1-800 numbers are not,” CFS said.
You May Also Like
House passes rail contract, mandates sick timeJan 12, 2023
Current Conditions for
New York, NY
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
Simple EggonomicsSep 07, 2023
Florida ag losses from Hurricane Idalia estimated between $78m and $307mSep 22, 2023
Grains find end-of-week bumpAug 01, 2023
Biden administration addresses ag labor challengesSep 22, 2023