Sponsored By

Flooding to cost Louisiana ag at least $110mFlooding to cost Louisiana ag at least $110m

Unharvested soybean crop will likely take hardest hit.

Krissa Welshans 1

August 23, 2016

3 Min Read
Flooding to cost Louisiana ag at least $110m

Heavy rains that recently caused historic flooding in south Louisiana will cost the state’s agriculture industry at least $110 million, according to preliminary estimates from the Louisiana State University AgCenter.

That figure is expected to grow as farmers realize the full extent of flood damage, AgCenter economist Kurt Guidry said. Many factors — including crop yield and quality reductions, increased production costs, infrastructure damage and loss of stored commodities — are not immediately clear. In addition, daily rains that are typical of summer weather patterns could slow the fall of floodwaters, delay harvest and cause even more damage to crops and animals.


The soybean crop will likely take the hardest hit, with about $46 million in yield losses expected. Very little of the 420,000 acres of soybeans in affected areas had been harvested before the flood, Guidry noted. “This is particularly true in the sugarcane-growing region, where soybeans were ready to be harvested at the time of flooding,” he said. “Many of those acres that flooded will experience nearly 100% losses.”

Yield reductions will cost the Louisiana rice industry about $33 million. Much of the south Louisiana crop was already harvested, but about 2%, or 72,000 acres, remained in the field during the flood.

Those fields may be a total loss, and any rice that is harvested will likely sell for lower prices because of sprouting and reduced milling quality, Guidry said. Farmers may not be able to produce a ratoon (second) crop, he said.

At least $3 million worth of sugarcane will have to be replanted, Guidry said. About 15% of the 100,000-120,000 acres planted every August and September was planted before the flood, he said. Poor field conditions may delay or prohibit planting the rest of those acres before harvest season.

“Once harvest begins, producers do not have the labor or resources to both plant and harvest at the same time,” Guidry said. “This could cause some acres to not be planted. This has a tremendous multiplier effect due to sugarcane’s multiyear production cycle.”

Corn-producing areas did not receive heavy flooding damage, although wet field conditions have delayed harvest, which can cause plants to fall over and grains to sprout, Guidry said. Those issues could cost corn farmers $10 million.

Other crops, including vegetables, fruits, sweet potatoes, cotton and grain sorghum, also saw some flood damage.

It is not yet clear how many livestock deaths the flood caused. Reduced pasture resources and forage availability will cost producers nearly $2 million, Guidry said.

The AgCenter will release a more detailed assessment of the flood’s damage to farming within a few weeks.

“Weather conditions over the next several weeks will be highly influential of the exact nature of the impacts for several commodities,” Guidry said. “Better conditions, mostly in terms of dry conditions, could help many of these crops rebound and certainly would allow for timelier harvest and limit production and quality issues.”

About the Author(s)

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Feedstuffs is the news source for animal agriculture

You May Also Like