USDA proposes updates to branding requirements for cattle from MexicoUSDA proposes updates to branding requirements for cattle from Mexico
Proposed changes address issues with current requirements.
April 12, 2018
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service is proposing to update its branding requirements for cattle entering the U.S. from Mexico. The changes would simplify the branding requirements to make the brands easier to apply and read, thus reducing errors. They would ensure that Mexican cattle are easily identifiable and traceable for the remainder of their lives, in the event of disease detection.
The government of Mexico requested changes to address issues with the current branding requirements. These include: confusion between the Mx and MX brands used for spayed heifers and breeding cattle, respectively; the small size of the brands, which can cause blotching and require rebranding, and the rejection of animals at ports of entry based on questions about whether they were branded correctly.
The proposed rule addresses these concerns by requiring an M brand for all cattle. The brand would also be larger in size for better readability. Together, these steps will reduce branding errors. To make it easy to distinguish between feeder and breeding cattle, brands for breeding animals would be placed on the shoulder, while feeder cattle would continue to be branded on the back hip.
The proposed rule would still allow for an MX ear tattoo option on breeding cattle instead of a brand, because the tattoos have not posed a readability problem and are a permanent form of identification. Cattle imported from Mexico would still require an approved ear tag for traceability purposes.
USDA is already allowing Mexico to use the M brand on spayed heifers and breeding cattle as an alternate to the Mx and MX brands. This has reduced errors and confusion at border ports. The change is proving to be beneficial for both countries.
USDA will accept comments on this proposed rule for 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. The proposed rule may be viewed here.
You May Also Like
House passes rail contract, mandates sick timeJan 12, 2023
Current Conditions for
New York, NY
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
Simple EggonomicsSep 07, 2023
This Week in Agribusiness, Sept. 23, 2023Sep 23, 2023
Florida ag losses from Hurricane Idalia estimated between $78m and $307mSep 22, 2023
Grains find end-of-week bumpAug 01, 2023