Oklahoma ‘fake meat’ labeling law challenged

Oklahoma Cattlemen’s Assn. and Oklahoma Pork Council ready to defend common meat labeling terms.

Jacqui Fatka, Policy editor

September 18, 2020

3 Min Read
Oklahoma ‘fake meat’ labeling law challenged

The Plant Based Foods Assn. (PBFA), the trade association representing more than 170 plant-based food companies, and Upton’s Naturals -- a small, independently owned maker of plant-based foods based in Chicago, Ill., and a founding board member of PBFA -- joined forces with the Institute for Justice (IJ) to file a federal lawsuit challenging a new Oklahoma food labeling law as a violation of the First Amendment.

During the 2020 Oklahoma legislative session, Rep. Toni Hasenbeck (R.) and Sen. Micheal Bergstrom (R.) authored HB 3806, which addresses labeling alternative, or "fake," meat products. The new law in Oklahoma, which takes effect Nov. 1, 2020, requires that a company include a disclaimer on its label as large and prominent as the product’s name stating that the food is plant based.

While other states such as Mississippi, Missouri and Arkansas have sought to make it illegal for plant-based foods to use terms such as “burgers” or “bacon,” the Oklahoma law attempts to make current labels illegal by requiring font size to be as large as the product’s name for qualifying terms such as “vegan” or “plant based.”

“Even though it is obvious that Upton’s Natural’s foods do not contain meat, the law would require changes to their food labels -- something the small company would not be able to afford,” PBFA said in a news release.

Related:Oklahoma passes meat labeling bill

“Our labels make it perfectly clear that our food is 100% vegan, but now, our meat industry competitors in Oklahoma want to force us to redesign our labels as if our safe, healthy products are potentially harmful,” Upton’s Naturals founder Daniel Staackmann said. “It’s not the first time we’ve had to fight a state law created by our competitors, and we look forward again to defending our First Amendment right to clearly communicate with our customers.”

PBFA executive director Michele Simon said, “It is highly likely that some PBFA members would withdraw their products from Oklahoma if the state’s new law went into effect.”

IJ senior attorney Justin Pearson said, “Oklahoma already has a law prohibiting misleading labels, but since the meat industry couldn’t use that law to thwart honest competition, they encouraged the legislature to pass a new law. The First Amendment does not allow the government to compel speech just to protect special-interest groups from competition.”

This bill was a lead priority for the Oklahoma Cattlemen’s Assn. in the 2020 legislative session, as it worked with the Oklahoma Pork Council. The bill overwhelmingly passed through the state House and Senate to the governor’s desk to become state law.

Related:Meat terms can be used on plant-based products in Mississippi

The Oklahoma cattle and pork groups issued a joint statement regarding the lawsuit saying: “We believe if a product wants to pass itself as beef, pork or meat, then it must be properly labeled so consumers will know exactly what they are purchasing. This language clarifies that ‘beef’ must come from cattle, that ‘pork’ must come from a pig and that ‘meat’ must come from livestock. We look forward to working with the state of Oklahoma in defending this commonsense law.”

Upton’s Naturals and PBFA previously teamed up with IJ to challenge a 2019 Mississippi law that made it a crime for plant-based foods to use common meat terms on their labels. Shortly after their federal lawsuit was filed, the Mississippi Department of Agriculture completely reversed course and proposed a new regulation that allowed plant-based foods to continue using their labels. Legal challenges to the laws in Missouri and Arkansas continue to be litigated in federal court.

About the Author(s)

Jacqui Fatka

Policy editor, Farm Futures

Jacqui Fatka grew up on a diversified livestock and grain farm in southwest Iowa and graduated from Iowa State University with a bachelor’s degree in journalism and mass communications, with a minor in agriculture education, in 2003. She’s been writing for agricultural audiences ever since. In college, she interned with Wallaces Farmer and cultivated her love of ag policy during an internship with the Iowa Pork Producers Association, working in Sen. Chuck Grassley’s Capitol Hill press office. In 2003, she started full time for Farm Progress companies’ state and regional publications as the e-content editor, and became Farm Futures’ policy editor in 2004. A few years later, she began covering grain and biofuels markets for the weekly newspaper Feedstuffs. As the current policy editor for Farm Progress, she covers the ongoing developments in ag policy, trade, regulations and court rulings. Fatka also serves as the interim executive secretary-treasurer for the North American Agricultural Journalists. She lives on a small acreage in central Ohio with her husband and three children.

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Feedstuffs is the news source for animal agriculture

You May Also Like