A U.S. Department of Agriculture researcher is giving guidance to growers in Montana and the Dakotas on how grazing sheep when fields are left fallow will affect soil quality.
Grazing sheep and other livestock was once common in the region before fertilizers were introduced in the 1950s. While fertilizers increased yields, they also increased nitrogen runoff and leaching, made soils more acidic and contributed to greenhouse gas emissions, according to Upendra Sainju, a soil scientist with USDA's Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in Sidney, Mont.
Growers looking for alternatives have turned once again to grazing sheep during seasons when fields are left fallow. The trend in Montana and North Dakota prompted Sainju and his ARS colleagues to study how the grazing affected crop quality, soil chemistry and amounts of nutrients in the soil. Each can have long-term effects on crop yields.
Sainju and his colleagues set up three cropping systems -- continuous spring wheat, spring wheat-fallow and winter wheat-fallow -- in southwestern Montana, ARS said. They compared soil quality on a series of plots where, during the fallow season, sheep were grazed, herbicides were used or the soil was tilled for weed control.
Over four years, sheep were grazed at rates of up to 153 sheep per hectare, glyphosate was applied at standard rates and soils were tilled to a standard depth of 15 cm. Soil samples from varying depths were analyzed for organic matter, nutrients, pH and electrical conductivity, which affects nutrient availability and plant growth.
The results showed that tillage did return more of the beneficial wheat residue to the soil than either grazing or the herbicide treatments, resulting in higher levels of calcium, sulfur and electrical conductivity in the soil, ARS reported.
However, grazing generally had no negative effects on soil organic matter and crop yields. Some of the phosphorus and potassium the sheep ate up in the wheat residue was returned to the soil by way of their feces and urine. Grazing also increased levels of magnesium and sodium in the soil, possibly because the urine and feces contained higher levels of those nutrients, ARS said.
The results of this study were published in the Agronomy Journal and Soil Science Society of America Journal.
Volume:85 Issue:12