Feedstuffs is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Improved method for determining allele frequencies may aid genomic prediction

TAGS: Dairy
Gerard Koudenburg/iStock/Getty Images dairy cow Holstein in field_Gerard Koudenburg_iStock_Getty Images-502111703.jpg
GLS method with sparse matrices is fast and highly accurate at estimating base generation allele frequencies.

Genomic prediction is the process that computes breeding values using information about alleles across the genome. In genomic prediction, such as with dairy cattle breeding, computed allele frequencies are used for several processes, according to researchers from Wageningen University Research-Animal Breeding & Genomics (WUR-ABG) in the Netherlands.

Many aspects of genomic prediction assume that the allele frequencies are equal to the frequencies in the pedigree founders or "base generation." In practice, the current method calculates allele frequencies from the genotypes available for the current population, mostly because this is convenient and computationally trivial, WUR-ABG researchers M.N. Aldridge, J. Vandenplas and M.P.L. Calus said.

In a new study published in the Journal of Dairy Science, they compared the current method using computed allele frequencies with two methods to compute the base generation allele frequencies in terms of the obtained frequencies and the computing time.

According to an announcement from WUR-ABG, Aldridge et al. simulated a typical dairy population for which the base generation allele frequencies were known. The base generation allele frequencies were estimated using the current method, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) or Generalized Least Squares (GLS) with either dense or sparse matrices. They then compared the accuracy of the estimated allele frequencies with the known frequencies and the computational requirements.

Aldridge et al. showed that the current method is very fast but is the least accurate. The BLUP method was relatively inefficient but highly accurate, the researchers said, while the GLS method with dense matrices was extremely inefficient but was highly accurate. The GLS method with sparse matrices was as efficient as the current method and highly accurate, the researchers said.

Aldridge et al. recommended using base generation allele frequencies in genomic prediction that are estimated using the GLS method with sparse matrices.

Source: Wageningen University & Research, which is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.