Feedstuffs is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Flashing lights may protect livestock by deterring predators

TAGS: Beef
Photo by Omar Ohrens UWis Puma deterrent.jpg
A field assistant and farmer install a camera trap near the herd’s sleeping site. With motion detection, the researchers were able to confirm the presence of predators in the area.
Study conducted in Chile shows that non-lethal deterrents may be successful in protecting livestock from certain predators.

In the U.S., some ranchers worry about wolf attacks on their livestock as the native predator is reintroduced to more areas, according to information from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. However, for livestock owners in Chile, wolves are not the potential threat; pumas are.

As in the U.S., researchers in Chile are trying to develop non-lethal ways to deter predator attacks and reduce the friction between carnivores and farmers. New research from the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies shows how lights can prevent puma attacks on livestock in Chile.

According to the university's announcement, the study found that bright, flashing lights overnight successfully protected livestock without harming the predators.

“What we saw was that for one calving season, farmers have not lost any part of their herds [using the lights],” said Omar Ohrens, the lead postdoctoral researcher for this study in the Carnivore Coexistence Lab within the Nelson Institute. For the research, published Jan. 3 in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, Ohrens worked with indigenous Aymara people in Chile to experiment with anti-predator lights.

Strategically placed around livestock, the lights, known as Foxlights, begin flashing in random patterns at sundown and emit patterns meant to simulate human activity, the university said. Built-in solar panels recharge the lights during the day.

To perform the study, Ohrens studied the geography of the Andean plateau — some 13,000 ft. above sea level — where the farmers worked to analyze the movements of pumas and foxes. Using trail cams and print tracking, the researchers verified that several pumas and foxes were likely near the herds.

The study recruited 11 livestock farmers, whose herds varied in size from 30 to nearly 400 llamas and alpacas. Ohrens’ team chose to focus on calving season because it is when the herds are most vulnerable. To ensure uniformity in their study, the researchers employed a crossover research method. In this system, the treatment and control groups switched halfway through the study, which ensured that all herds received the Foxlight deterrent treatment at some point during the research, the announcement said.

The farmers in the control groups without lights recorded several puma attacks, which confirmed that there were predators in the area. However, when farmers were reassigned to have access to the lights, they avoided attacks. These results suggested that geographical factors do not significantly diminish the lights’ effectiveness.

“That’s why this study is so important,” said Adrian Treves, a professor of environmental studies and founder of the Carnivore Coexistence Lab. “Omar’s study shows that non-lethal methods have been proven effective in multiple settings with different livestock and carnivores.”

In earlier work, Ohrens surveyed the same farmers about how they’ve tried to prevent attacks in the past. In those interviews, Ohrens found that most of the farmers wanted to find non-lethal ways to protect their herds because the lethal methods were not preventing attacks from occurring -- a finding that research on livestock attacks supports, the researchers said.

Although the lights proved effective against pumas over the four-month trial, they did not deter Andean foxes. Ohrens wasn’t surprised that the foxes stuck around.

“What I’ve seen is that Andean foxes are not very scared of humans. They can get pretty close and even take food from people’s hands,” he said. “So, they’re not going to be scared by lights that simulate human activity.”

The researchers said the approach will need to be refined to extend the deterrent system to other regions in and out of Latin America, but to Ohrens, Treves and their collaborators, the results suggest a creative solution to a perennial problem where farms come up against the natural world.

“This study captures the whole ethic of the Nelson Institute of combining multiple disciplines to answer a societal problem,” Treves said.

Source: University of Wisconsin-Madison, which is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.