The U.S. Department of Agriculture awarded $200 million to 57 organizations through the Agricultural Trade Promotion (ATP) Program to help U.S. farmers and ranchers identify and access new export markets. ATP is one of three USDA programs created to mitigate the effects of unjustified trade retaliation against U.S. farmers and exporters. USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) accepted ATP Program applications – totaling nearly $600 million – from U.S. trade associations, cooperatives and other industry-affiliated organizations between Sept.4 and Nov. 2.

For instance, the American Soybean Assn. (ASA) was awarded $21.882 million. The Dairy Export Council received an award of $5.288 million. The Southern United States Trade Assn. received $12,592 millio. The U.S. Grains Council received $13,945 million, and the U.S. Meat Export Federation received $17,557 million. (View the full list here.)

President Donald Trump authorized up to $12 billion in programs to provide assistance to U.S. agriculture through a trade mitigation package announced by Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue on Sept. 4, 2018. In addition to the $200 million allocated to the ATP Program, the package also included the Market Facilitation Program to provide payments to farmers harmed by retaliatory tariffs and a food purchase and distribution program to assist producers of targeted commodities.

Related:FAS forges ahead in expanding ag trade

“At USDA, we are always looking to expand existing markets or open new ones, so we are proud to make good on the third leg of the President’s promise to America’s farmers,” Perdue said. “This infusion will help us develop other markets and move us away from being dependent on one large customer for our agricultural products. This is seed money, leveraged by hundreds of millions of dollars from the private sector, that will help to increase our agricultural exports.”

All sectors of U.S. agriculture, including fish and forest product producers, were eligible to apply for cost-share assistance under the ATP Program. FAS evaluated applications according to criteria that included the potential for export growth in the target market, direct injury from the imposed retaliatory tariffs and the likelihood that the proposed project or activity will have a near-term impact on agricultural exports.

“We were pleased to see the large demand for participation in the program and truly got some out-of-the-box ideas that we are hopeful will expand our global footprint,” Perdue said. “We examined all applications carefully, considered our ranking criteria and awarded the funds in order to make the best use of taxpayer dollars in growing agricultural trade.”

Related:USDA issues 2nd round of trade aid payments