The American lamb checkoff program has positively contributed to American lamb demand and industry profits, according to the Texas A&M University 2019 report “Return on Investment in the American Lamb Checkoff Program” conducted by agricultural economists Gary Williams and Dan Hanselka.

After extensive econometric modeling, researchers concluded that the lamb program added 2.4-2.7% of the annual value of retail lamb. The study covered 2002 to 2018, the time period during which the American Lamb Board (ALB) was conducting programs. This new study has similar results compared to five years ago, when the last study was released.

This white paper covers both traditional and non-traditional U.S. lamb markets and compiles relevant data from the Livestock Marketing Information Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, industry reports on lamb sales and other reputable sources, according to the announcement from ALB.

The paper discusses factors that affect seasonal supply, the role of U.S. and imported lamb, impact on all industry segments, opportunities to alter the U.S. seasonal supply and case studies of producers who have shifted season of production to meet the needs of their customers, the announcement said.

According to Williams and Hanselka, “With modest funds available for promotion, ALB succeeded in substantially enhancing the annual value of U.S. lamb consumed.” The American lamb checkoff program’s promotion program is about $1.5 million a year, with another $0.5 million invested in education and research programs. Administration costs must be less than 10% of yearly collections.

The new study indicated that this 2.4-2.7% “lift” is the result of increased consumption of lamb and a more modest increase in retail price, the announcement said. ALB promotion programs have helped increase the U.S. production share of lamb consumption to “some extent over time.”

“These results are a win for every member of the American lamb industry,” said ALB chairman Dale Thorne, a Michigan lamb producer and feeder. “The purpose of our checkoff is to increase demand for American Lamb and enhance opportunities for all segments to profit. This extensive analysis tells us that we remain on the right track with our promotion programs.”

The price of American lamb is of particular interest to the industry. While the effect of lamb price on product demand has declined in recent years, a 10% increase in the price of lamb leads to a decline of about 6% in lamb demand, the researchers said. When it comes to competitive meats, a 10% decline in the price of beef results in about a 5% decline in the quantity of lamb demanded while the price of pork is insignificant as a driver of lamb demand. As for poultry, U.S. consumers do not consider it to be a substitute for lamb, the report says.

Consumers’ “habit persistence” has a statistically significant effect on U.S. lamb consumption and has increased among current lamb eaters during recent years. Habit persistence means that past consumption influences current preferences and demand. So, according to this study, the more that U.S. consumers can be enticed to choose American lamb, the more likely they are to continue doing so, ALB said.

Another measure of checkoff program contribution to the industry is the cost-to-benefit ratio. The Texas A&M study reported that the average return to industry stakeholders for every $1 invested into the lamb checkoff is approximately $14.20.

By law, the checkoff program must undergo an economic return on investment analysis every five years.

ALB is an industry-funded national promotion, research and information organization that represents all sectors of the American lamb industry including producers, feeders, seedstock producers and processors. The 13-member board, appointed by the secretary of agriculture, is focused on increasing demand by promoting the freshness, flavor, nutritional benefits and culinary versatility of American lamb.

Source: American Lamb Board, which is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.