Ninety-day extension gives ethanol groups more time to make case for tariff-free trade of ethanol.

Jacqui Fatka, Policy editor

September 15, 2020

3 Min Read
Brazil extends ethanol tariff rate quota

After expiring on Aug. 31, a 20% tariff was temporarily applied to all U.S. ethanol, but now Brazil’s tariff rate quota (TRQ) has been extended for a further 90 days starting on Sept. 14. The previous TRQ allowed nearly 200 million gal. of U.S. ethanol to be imported tariff free. Biofuel groups expressed frustration that the extension does not provide market certainty moving forward.

In a joint statement, U.S. Grains Council president and chief executive officer Ryan LeGrand, Growth Energy CEO Emily Skor, National Corn Growers Assn. CEO Jon Doggett and Renewable Fuels Assn. president and CEO Geoff Cooper said they believe the 90-day extension of the TRQ serves neither Brazil’s consumers nor the Brazilian government’s own decarbonization goals, especially while Brazil’s ethanol producers continue to be afforded virtually tariff-free access to the U.S. market.

“The extension falls during Brazil’s annual inter-harvest period, when U.S. ethanol exports to Brazil are traditionally low, causing greater uncertainty for U.S. exporters looking to make selling decisions now for the traditionally higher Brazilian demand in the winter months,” the groups said. “While the Brazilian ethanol market has not been fully reopened to imports, we appreciate the continued support and efforts of the U.S. government as we use this 90-day period to aggressively pursue an open and mutually beneficial ethanol trading relationship with Brazil.”

Related:Brazil looks to re-impose 20% ethanol tariff

Prior to the imposition of the TRQ, Brazil was the largest export destination for U.S. ethanol, American Coalition for Ethanol (ACE) CEO Brian Jennings said. “Our countries maintained a reciprocal policy of applying minimum or zero duties on ethanol imports for nearly a decade, and we hope Brazil will put an end to its protectionist trade policies toward our U.S. ethanol industry. The TRQ unnecessarily limits our export potential, and we hope further negotiations will ultimately make it easier for producers to pursue free and fair trade for ethanol in the future.”

Jennings added, “While an extension is better than the flat 20% tariff on all U.S. exports, this merely kicks the can down the road past the election and can be added to the list of piling uncertainties facing our industry. We have been trying to restore demand at home and around the world, and in a year like 2020, finding growth opportunities are of the utmost importance.”

The joint statement noted that the U.S. ethanol industry actively sought -- through repeated dialogue with local industry and government -- to illustrate the negative impacts of tariffs on Brazilian consumers and the Brazilian government’s decarbonization goals. “However, it seems Brazil’s government has left its own consumers to pay the price through higher fuel costs once again. While we would have preferred Brazil abandon its ethanol import tariffs entirely and resume its free trade posture on ethanol, which it held for several years before the TRQ, we view its decision to temporarily extend the TRQ on ethanol at the current level as an opportunity to continue discussions toward that end,” the leaders added.

Related:White House considers reciprocal tariffs on Brazilian ethanol

The U.S. ethanol industry remains focused on expanding the global use of low-carbon ethanol, reducing barriers to trade and elevating its prominence in energy discussions, the statement said, adding, “We remain eager to collaborate and cooperate with other nations that share in the vision of a free and open global ethanol market.”

About the Author(s)

Jacqui Fatka

Policy editor, Farm Futures

Jacqui Fatka grew up on a diversified livestock and grain farm in southwest Iowa and graduated from Iowa State University with a bachelor’s degree in journalism and mass communications, with a minor in agriculture education, in 2003. She’s been writing for agricultural audiences ever since. In college, she interned with Wallaces Farmer and cultivated her love of ag policy during an internship with the Iowa Pork Producers Association, working in Sen. Chuck Grassley’s Capitol Hill press office. In 2003, she started full time for Farm Progress companies’ state and regional publications as the e-content editor, and became Farm Futures’ policy editor in 2004. A few years later, she began covering grain and biofuels markets for the weekly newspaper Feedstuffs. As the current policy editor for Farm Progress, she covers the ongoing developments in ag policy, trade, regulations and court rulings. Fatka also serves as the interim executive secretary-treasurer for the North American Agricultural Journalists. She lives on a small acreage in central Ohio with her husband and three children.

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Feedstuffs is the news source for animal agriculture

You May Also Like