Australia’s pork producers have passed another key milestone in their positive and world leading move to voluntarily phase out the use of “sow” or “gestation” stalls.
Interim survey results of industry progress on the phase out shows that over 60% of sows are now gestation stall free. The industry forecasts that when the survey is complete, more than two thirds of Australian sows will be shown to be meeting the gestation stall free phase out definition right now.
According to Australian Pork Limted (APL), gestation stall free means that a sow will only spend up to 5 days in a mating stall, to stabilize pregnancy and then later be moved into a farrowing crate or birthing stall, up to a week before she is due to give birth. In this way, Australia’s pregnant sows only spend a maximum of 10% of their total pregnancy individually confined under the gestation stall free definition.
APL chief executive Officer, Andrew Spencer said in his speech to the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences Outlook Conference in Canberra, “This is a world leading initiative, boosting Australia’s animal welfare credentials globally that puts us well ahead of what is happening in other countries. In Europe, pregnant sows are confined for up to 30 percent of their pregnancy (except in the Netherlands and the UK) while in North America (US and Canada) they still typically use gestation stalls for the entirety of a sows pregnancy.”
Spencer said, “The gestation stall phase out initiative was our industry’s response to meet the growing desires among consumers for higher welfare food, balanced with ensuring the long term sustainability of the industry by managing the transition in a balanced/cost controlled way. Our industry’s ability to make the change has come through millions of dollars of investment in research and development with estimates of well over $50 million to complete this change made voluntarily by farmers.
Furthermore, “Despite the phenomenal efforts and progress made by the Australian industry since making the decision just over three years ago, we still face considerable difficulties and challenges. This includes competition from subsidized imported pork sent to Australia from countries with lower welfare standards than we have here. At the same time, our industry has been impacted by high profile campaigns from anti farming groups that have mislead consumers and worse still, farm invasions by these groups under the guise of protecting animal welfare. If animal welfare is the true motivation for these groups then they should be supporting Australian farmers in implementing their world leading initiative.”
Spencer explained that the broader challenge for Australian pig farmers was not only communicating its positive results in animal welfare, but also its leadership on environmental initiatives including its management of by-products, reduction in carbon emissions and the positive impact this has on production costs.
Gaining recognition and managing consumers’ expectations about different types of pork production, the high quality Australian pork and how healthy it is to eat are also high on our agenda.