Gauging value of origin labels

Gauging value of origin labels

Survey shows origin of meat products less important to U.S. consumers than price, safety, taste and nutrition.

SINCE its introduction in 2009 and later revision in 2013, the U.S. mandatory country-of-origin labeling (mCOOL) rule has stirred lengthy, hearty discussions of its economic impact on stakeholders throughout the entire meat and livestock chain.

Consumer knowledge of changes to meat and meat product labels imposed by mCOOL, however, has not been as highly debated or regularly evaluated academically — until Oklahoma State University recently released

All access premium subscription

This content requires a subscription to Feedstuffs in order to access. If you are a paid subscriber, use your email and password to Log In now.

Current Feedstuffs Subscribers: Online and mobile access are now included at no charge to you. To read this article, use your subscriber email and password to log-in to your account (or contact us for assistance in updating your account.)

Not Currently a Subscriber: Subscribe NOW to Feedstuffs and receive our print and/or digital publications, enewsletters and premium online content. Visit and click on Subscribe at the top of the page for more information.



Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.